Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

Which of the following is an absolute defense to defamation?


A) The statement is true.
B) The statement was said on private property.
C) The defendant did not know the plaintiff.
D) The plaintiff was not present when the statement was made.
E) The statement was made in a contributory negligence jurisdiction.

F) D) and E)
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Courts typically award punitive damages for pain and suffering,costs of repairing damaged property,medical expenses,and lost wages.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following doctrines require(s) the court to determine the percentage of fault of the defendant and then hold the defendant liable for that percentage of the plaintiff's damages,but with the requirement that the defendant be more than 50 percent at fault before the plaintiff can recover?


A) Assumption of the risk.
B) Last-clear-chance.
C) Modified comparative negligence.
D) Pure comparative negligence.
E) Both modified comparative negligence and last-clear-chance.

F) A) and D)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What does the term "negligence per se" mean literally?


A) Negligence of the spoken word.
B) Negligence of the person.
C) Negligence in or of itself.
D) Absolute wrongdoing.
E) Permissible negligence.

F) C) and D)
G) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Diving Fiasco.Mike,who owns a dive shop in the United States,decides to take a group of his customers diving in U.S.waters.Mike is aware that sharks occasionally visit the area where the divers will be visiting.He is also aware that,while stingrays are usually tame,they can become aggressive when fed.Mike does not reveal that information to the group of divers going with him.The divers go down into the water,and some have squid with which to feed the stingrays.During the dive,one of the stingrays becomes agitated and latches onto diver Susie's arm.Susie is so disconcerted that she drops her regulator (her breathing device) from her mouth and is in considerable difficulty.Another diver,Billy,encounters a shark,which snaps at him.While the shark does not actually bite Billy,the attack results in damage to his diving equipment.Mike,who is in charge of the dive,does nothing to help and leaves the other divers to return to the boat because the dive turned out to be more trouble than expected.Wendy,another diver on the trip,also returns to the boat without doing anything to help the divers in distress.Sam,on the other hand,goes to rescue the divers who are in distress.He manages to do so but in the process he pulls his back and requires medical care.All divers are very unhappy with Mike.Which of the following is true regarding whether Wendy and Sam had a duty to come to the assistance of the divers in peril?


A) Neither Wendy nor Sam had a duty to go to the aid of the divers who were in peril.
B) Wendy and Sam had a duty to go to the aid of the divers in peril only if Mike refused to do so.
C) Wendy and Sam did not have a duty to go to the aid of the divers in peril unless they were the first to see the problem.
D) Wendy and Sam had a duty to assist the divers in peril only if they were acquainted prior to the dive with the divers who were in peril.They had no duty to help strangers.
E) Sam and Wendy had a duty to help the divers who were in peril if personal safety was involved but not if the only issue was damage to property.

F) D) and E)
G) B) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Cause in fact is also known as ________ cause.


A) proximate
B) legal
C) actual
D) nominal
E) exemplary

F) A) and D)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is not a typical type of compensatory damage?


A) Pain and suffering.
B) Costs of repairing damaged property.
C) Medical expenses.
D) Attorney fees.
E) Lost wages.

F) C) and D)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Hair Stylist Woes.Maryann went to see her hair stylist,Candy.Maryann,who had black,curly hair,requested straight,blond hair.Candy told her that she could make that change,but there would be significant upkeep involved.Candy made the change,but Maryann did not do the upkeep required.She also falsely claimed that Candy did not do what Maryann asked her to do,that Candy lied to her,and that Candy was professionally incompetent.Maryann made the statements to friends of hers.She also wrote an editorial in her college newspaper to the effect that Candy's shop should be avoided at all costs because Candy was incompetent.In fact,Candy was a good hair stylist and enjoyed a good reputation up until the time that Maryann started her criticism.Candy threatened to sue Maryann for defamation,but Maryann told Candy that Candy could not prevail because Candy could not prove loss of income.Candy had to admit that while her reputation had been damaged somewhat,the damage was primarily among the college population.Her income kept increasing from other segments of the community,and she had suffered no net loss.The defamation printed in the school newspaper would be which of the following?


A) Libel.
B) Slander.
C) Both libel and slander.
D) Neither libel nor slander,because an editorial was involved.
E) Neither libel nor slander,because the falsehood involved matters of appearance not business-related matters.

F) A) and B)
G) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A false statement of a material fact regarding ownership of business property that results in a loss of sales is referred to as ________.


A) slander of quality
B) trade libel
C) libel of title
D) slander of title
E) negligent interference with contractual relations

F) A) and B)
G) B) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Tina negligently hits student Susie with her car.Susie,rendered unconscious from the impact,is lying on the street.Which of the following is a correct statement regarding whether Tina has a legal duty to come to the aid of Susie after the accident?


A) Tina has no legal duty to come to Susie's aid.
B) Tina has a legal duty to come to Susie's aid because she negligently hit her.
C) Tina has a legal duty to come to Susie's aid,but only if police do not arrive on the scene within a reasonable amount of time.
D) Tina has a legal duty to come to Susie's aid,but only if Susie has no medical insurance.
E) Tina has a legal duty to come to Susie's aid,but only if no one without a conflict of interest is willing to do so.

F) B) and C)
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Blow-Up.Jeanie is hauling several containers of gasoline in her vehicle in preparation for riding her personal watercraft.On the way home,Jeanie stops at the automatic teller machine at her bank and exits her car.Holly pulls behind her and negligently rear-ends Jeanie's car.The car explodes and results in the bank building burning to the ground.The bank sues Holly for negligence claiming that Holly should have to pay for the entire bank building.The bank claimed that it should be able to recover under the res ipsa loquitur doctrine.Which of the following is true regarding whether actual cause exists in the bank's action against Holly?


A) Actual causation would exist because the bank would not have been damaged if Holly had fulfilled her duty to drive properly.
B) Actual cause is present because as a matter of policy,it is believed that someone who rear-ends a vehicle should be responsible for damages.
C) Actual cause is present because Holly was the legal cause of the bank burning.
D) Actual cause is not present because Holly is not the legal cause of the bank burning.
E) Actual cause is not present because Holly is not the proximate cause of the bank burning.

F) A) and D)
G) B) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A

List and discuss the three objectives of tort law.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Tort law's primary objective is to provi...

View Answer

Which is not an example of slander per se?


A) A written poster hanging in the school cafeteria which states that the principal stole money from the school treasury.
B) Calling someone professionally incompetent.
C) Telling another person that someone has a loathsome,communicable disease.
D) Stating that another student has committed a crime for which imprisonment is possible.
E) Informing classmates that a female student in your business law class has engaged in sexual misconduct.

F) B) and D)
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Most states have replaced comparative negligence with contributory negligence.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Under which of the following situations does the tort of trespass to realty occur?


A) When a person causes an object to be placed on the land of another without the landowner's permission.
B) When a person stays on the land of another once the owner tells him to depart.
C) When a person refuses to remove something he placed on the property that the owner of the property asked him remove.
D) When a person causes an object to be placed on the land of another without the landowner's permission,when a person stays on the land of another when the owner tells him to depart,and when a person refuses to remove something he placed on the property that the owner of the property asked him remove.
E) None of these,because a person does not commit trespass to realty unless it can be established that the person initially entered the land of another without permission.

F) B) and E)
G) B) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Assume a jurisdiction has a law that all residential swimming pools must have a fence that is at least six feet tall surrounding the swimming pool.Cindy has a pool in her backyard,but she just had it built a few months ago and has not since had the extra money to build the fence.Unfortunately,one of the neighborhood children goes swimming in the pool and drowns.The parents of the child sue Cindy.Discuss how they would likely go about proving their case against Cindy and the elements that would be required to establish their case.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The parents would likely rely upon the c...

View Answer

Chewer.The state in which Susan lives has a statute prohibiting dogs running at large.All dogs are required to be on a leash whenever they are off the owner's premises.Susan's dog,while not on a leash,visits the home of a neighbor down the street.While there,the dog carries off an expensive pair of shoes belonging to Robert.The shoes are chewed and destroyed.A neighbor informed Robert of what had happened.Robert commented that he never should have left his $300 shoes lying on the deck in the first place but that he expects to be repaid by Susan.Robert found out that the dog had carried away a number of shoes and other articles in the neighborhood,chewing them to pieces.Susan did nothing to warn anyone.Robert thinks that she should be punished for her activities,which would perhaps deter her from allowing the dog to run loose.Which of the following theories will Susan likely use to defend herself?


A) Assumption of the risk.
B) Comparative negligence.
C) Res ipsa loquitur.
D) Negligence per se.
E) Res ipsa loquitur and negligence per se.

F) A) and E)
G) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

B

The ________ standard is a measurement of the way members of society expect an individual to act in a given situation.


A) reasonable person
B) subjective juror
C) beyond reproach
D) perfect accountability
E) reasonable accountability

F) B) and E)
G) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A

Diving Fiasco.Mike,who owns a dive shop in the United States,decides to take a group of his customers diving in U.S.waters.Mike is aware that sharks occasionally visit the area where the divers will be visiting.He is also aware that,while stingrays are usually tame,they can become aggressive when fed.Mike does not reveal that information to the group of divers going with him.The divers go down into the water,and some have squid with which to feed the stingrays.During the dive,one of the stingrays becomes agitated and latches onto diver Susie's arm.Susie is so disconcerted that she drops her regulator (her breathing device) from her mouth and is in considerable difficulty.Another diver,Billy,encounters a shark,which snaps at him.While the shark does not actually bite Billy,the attack results in damage to his diving equipment.Mike,who is in charge of the dive,does nothing to help and leaves the other divers to return to the boat because the dive turned out to be more trouble than expected.Wendy,another diver on the trip,also returns to the boat without doing anything to help the divers in distress.Sam,on the other hand,goes to rescue the divers who are in distress.He manages to do so but in the process he pulls his back and requires medical care.All divers are very unhappy with Mike.Billy wants to sue Mike for damages because of his damaged equipment.Which of the following is the most likely result?


A) He will win because Mike should have warned him about the occasional appearance of sharks.
B) He will lose because Mike had no duty to warn him of anything.
C) He will lose because he did not sustain physical injury.
D) He will win,but only if he can establish that he had a contract with Mike whereby Mike would reveal harmful conditions.
E) He will win,but only if he can establish that he did not have insurance to cover the equipment.

F) B) and D)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is a condition required for the imposition of strict liability?


A) The activity involves negligence.
B) The activity involves trespassing.
C) The activity is undertaken by a minor.
D) The activity is so inherently dangerous that it cannot ever be safely undertaken.
E) The activity is heavily regulated.

F) All of the above
G) B) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 1 - 20 of 126

Related Exams

Show Answer