Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, because Martin forged the names of the employees.
B) Yes, because Martin posed as an imposter in regard to the employees.
C) Yes, because the bank has a cause of action against Martin and can likely get a default judgment.
D) No, because of the imposter rule.
E) No, because of the fictitious-payee rule.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) As a maker.
B) As a drawer.
C) As an acceptor.
D) As an endorser.
E) All of these.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) When the person has actual notice of the fact.
B) When the facts and circumstances known to the person at the time in question give the person reason to know that the facts exist.
C) When the person receives notice or notification of the facts.
D) When the person has actual notice of the fact, when the facts and circumstances known to the person at the time in question give the person reason to know that the facts exist, and also when the person receives notice or notification of the facts.
E) When the person has actual knowledge of the fact, or the facts and circumstances known to the person at the time in question give the person reason to know that the fact exists, but not that the person receives notice or notification of the fact.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The holder performs the promise for which the instrument was issued or has started performance.
B) The holder acquires a security interest or other lien in the instrument.
C) The holder takes the instrument for payment of a preceding claim.
D) The holder exchanges the instrument for another negotiable instrument.
E) The holder exchanges the instrument for an irrevocable obligation to a third party.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Biometric.
B) Key-based.
C) Identifiable.
D) Biometric, key-based, and identifiable.
E) Biometric and key-based, but not identifiable.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The alteration has no effect because a holder is not charged with examining an instrument presented for payment.
B) The alteration will likely prohibit her from being a holder in due course.
C) The alteration will affect her status as a holder in due course only if she had been put on notice of prior criminal behavior in the past on the part of Bob.
D) The alteration will affect her status as a holder in due course only if the issuer can establish that it was not negligent in allowing a thief to gain access resulting in the alteration.
E) The alteration will affect her status as a holder in due course because it involved over $500; otherwise, based on the purpose of the law to protect holders, the alteration would have had no effect.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Because the checks were forged, the principal can receive reimbursement of the funds from any maker involved or any bank that cashed the checks.
B) The principal can receive reimbursement from makers of the checks only.
C) The principal can receive reimbursement from any bank that cashed the checks only.
D) It is likely that it will be determined that the principal ratified the signatures and that the principal cannot recover from either makers or banks that cashed the checks.
E) The principal can recover from either the makers or any banks who cashed the checks only if it can be shown that the agent cannot be located for criminal prosecution.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Transfer.
B) Presentment.
C) Acknowledgement.
D) Transfer, presentment, and acknowledgement.
E) Transfer and presentment, but not acknowledgement.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The holder of the instrument must present the instrument in a proper and timely fashion.
B) The instrument must be dishonored.
C) Notice of the dishonor must be given to the drawer.
D) The holder of the instrument must present the instrument in a proper and timely fashion, the instrument must be dishonored, and notice of the dishonor must be given to the drawer.
E) The holder of the instrument must present the instrument in a proper and timely fashion and the instrument must be dishonored, but there is no requirement of notice of dishonor since the injured party may proceed directly to court.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Doreen.
B) Hot Dresses, Inc.
C) Betty, because she owned Hot Dresses, Inc.
D) Doreen's bank.
E) Betty's bank.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The party must be a holder of a complete and authentic negotiable instrument.
B) The holder must take the instrument for value.
C) The holder must take the instrument in good faith.
D) The holder must take the instrument without notice of defects.
E) The holder must either pay for the instrument or receive it as a gift.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Ratification.
B) Authorization.
C) Acknowledgement.
D) Pre-approval.
E) Post-approval.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) 1990
B) 1994
C) 1998
D) 2000
E) None of these
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Commercial standards
B) Subjective reasonableness.
C) Objective reasonableness.
D) Good faith.
E) Reasonable investigation.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Breach of contract or warranty.
B) Fraud in the inducement.
C) Illegality.
D) Breach of contract or warranty, fraud in the inducement, and illegality.
E) Illegality and lack or failure of consideration, but not breach of contract or warranty.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Makers and acceptors are primarily liable for a negotiable instrument, while drawers and endorsers are secondarily liable.
B) Drawers and endorsers are primarily liable, while makers and acceptors are secondarily liable.
C) Makers and drawers are primarily liable, while acceptors and endorsers are secondarily liable.
D) Acceptors and endorsers are primarily liable, while makers and drawers are secondarily liable.
E) Makers, acceptors, drawers, and endorsers are all secondarily liable.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 61 - 80 of 86
Related Exams